DorEm Answers

Dorigen and P/O,

Here is an easy-to-answer question from one of our devoted readers (or is it “our one devoted reader?”):

“Which is worse: men in polo shirts, khakis, and woven leather belts _or_ crocks?”

This…

Equals this…

To go about this another way, I will answer your question with another question – “What is worse than Crocks?”  That might be one of those “What is the sound of one hand clapping?” questions – there is no answer, only contemplation.

Ok, except for that one time when Bart Simpson made a clapping sound with one hand, and also the fact that Ugg boots are just as bad as Crocks, but you get where I’m going with this.  Crocks are the anti-Christ to holy shoe worship.

Meanwhile, the polo / khaki / woven belt combo is not all that bad if in a proper fit.

See, J Crew knows what I’m talking about.

But, then again, as mentioned in my bio (see the “About” page) I am so into the preppy/boho look these days that I actually saw fit to add it to my two sentence bio.

Emily

Dorigen & P/O,

Let’s take a look at another question submitted by our fan:

“Explain blouses with a low waistline in the back and a high waistline in the front.”

Ah, the mullet shirt.  In contrast to the haircut, the top is all business in the back and a scantily clad party in the front (the business being hiding a lower back tramp stamp and the party being showing off a contoured, spray-tanned midriff and/or high waisted pant or skort).

haaaaaaaaay

I must admit that I did not find the mullet shirt strange in the 80’s. A friend of mine had an oversized white button down version that was very pseudo-tux shirt/tux jacket.  Why buy both?  And I thought she was working it with black stirrup leggings and black velvet flats.  I also remember a lot of standard cut shirts being tucked in the front and loose in the back; the mullet shirt must have been some sort of emulation of that conspicuously “casual” styling.

I feel like this trend started to cover up all those flat asses in the 80’s.  For years I was convinced that Queen’s song “Fat Bottom Girls” was in fact “Flat Bottom Girls,” because all the “ladies” in the hair rock videos wore high wasted bikinis that did nothing for their backside.

Now the hipsters are coveting all things from the 80’s and 90’s, with no discerning eye for ugliness.  I wish the kids were employing a sense of irony, but instead it all seems to be just a gross misunderstanding.  I blame Urban Outfitters for this massive fashion confusion of a generation.

We wore mullet shirts because we were trying something new, something beachy, and we were wrong.  Learn from our mistakes; don’t repeat them.

Emily

Dorigen,

Are gauchos just “movement clothes” or do they serve a higher, fashionable purpose?

Emily

Emily,

In short, “movement clothes.” And not very good ones, either.  The wide leg makes working out or otherwise “moving” awkward and potentially dangerous.  I find the extra fabric in even just a boot cut movement pant prone to tangling up and causing potential falls.

I never understood the gaucho  They were hugely popular amongst the young NYC ladies in 2001-03, who all wore them to run their weekend errands about town.  For most women, the low, banded waist, comined with the clingy fabric, created levels of cameltoe or even polterwang seldom experienced before or since.  I do see the following “Hot Fash” brand is available at Sears, which should indicate who might be buying these today. 

Dorigen

Dorigen,

Please explain “jeggings.”

Emily

Emily,

“Jeggings” are what used to be called “stretch pants” made out of denim.  They are effectively sausage casings for your legs.  I have a pair that I think are flattering, but I may be wrong.  Every single time I wear them, my husband says “are your jeans tight enough”?  I think this may be his subtle way of suggesting they might not be that flattering.

Dorigen